WebFeb 12, 2016 · By merging a master into your feature branch, you are introducing an extra commit, the master -> feature merge. Then there's also another comming when this branch gets merged to master. With rebasing, you're effectively avoiding the … Web1 day ago · How can I re-create the commit histories so that I can proceed to merge "normally" (i.e. without the --allow-unrelated-histories flag) in subsequent merges of the two branches? After merging apprentice into master twice, first with --squash, then without, my commit history on master looks something like this:
Merge vs. Squash Merge ooloo.io
WebTo configure the default squashing behavior for all merge requests in your project: On the top bar, select Main menu > Projects and find your project. On the left sidebar, select Settings > Merge requests. In the Squash commits when merging section, select your desired behavior: WebThis option is the equal as entering git merge --squash in the command line. Record: … health statistics
When to use Squash, Merge, and Rebase? - Medium
WebOct 30, 2024 · Now, you’ve got three options for how to merge it: You can make a merge commit, you can rebase and merge, or you can squash and merge. All three are useful in different circumstances. Let’s review: Screenshot of the GitHub merge options: create a merge commit, squash and merge, or rebase and merge. Merge Commit WebSquash Merge. Many professional teams use a different setup for their GitHub … WebSep 30, 2024 · Comparing Squash vs. Merge Git Commits As a refresher, the difference between a “squash commit” and a “merge commit” is that a regular “merge” includes all of the Git commits in the history of the … health station คือ