Danial latifi v union of india summary
WebJun 2, 2024 · The case was a suit filed by the State of West Bengal against the Union of India for a declaration stating that the Parliament was not competent enough to make laws authorizing the Union to acquire land and to have rights over any such land, which rests with the state. The Parliament had passed Acquisition and Development Act, 1947 which … WebApr 28, 2024 · Therefore, the established legitimacy of the Act was tested under the steady gaze of the Supreme Court for Danial Latifi through a writ appeal. Appellant’s Contention Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure …
Danial latifi v union of india summary
Did you know?
WebDec 29, 2024 · The Danial Latifi case succeeded in integrating both the personal laws and the codified laws effectively in a way that it addressed all parts of the society and … WebJun 28, 2024 · To overcome the ratio of the said decision, the present Act has been enacted and Section 3 (1) (a) is not in discord with the personal law. 11. Shri Y.H. Muchhala, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board submitted that the main object of the Act is to undo Shah Bano case.
WebThe matter resurfaced before the Supreme Court in Danial Latifi v. Union Of India when the constitutional validity of the MWPRDA, 1986 was challenged on the grounds that the law was discriminatory and violative of the right to equality guaranteed under … The matter resurfaced before the Supreme Court in Danial Latifi v. Union Of India … WebJun 22, 2024 · Case Summary : Menka Gandhi vs Union of India. By E-Justice India Case Summary 0 Comments. CITATION- AIR 1978 SC 597 BENCH- M.H. BEG (CJI), Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.R. KRISHNA IYER, P.N. BHAGWATI, N.L. UNTWALIA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI & P.S. KAILASAM JJS. FACTS- Maneka Gandhi was a journalist. Her …
WebCASE ANALYSIS-Arvind Singh Kushwaha1. DANIAL LATIFI v. UNION OF INDIA ((2001) 7 SCC 740 : 2001 CriLJ 4660) Bench: G.B. Pattanaik, S. Rajendra Babu, D.P. Mohapatra, Doraiswamy Raju, Shivaraj V. Patil Decided on September 28, 2001. Introduction: After the landmark judgment of Shah Bano’s case, there was a chaos condition in the Muslim … WebCASE STUDY- 3. Danial Latifi Vs. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 3958. FACTS IN BRIEF:-. In this case, the constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 was challenged before the Supreme Court. The Act was passed to appease a particular. section of the society and with the intention of making the decision ...
WebDanial Latifi v. Union of IndiaAIR 2001 SC 3958One of the counsels of Shah Bano’s, Danial Latifi challenged the act, Protection of Rights on Divorce on the basis of its …
WebUnion Of India by Daniel Latifi in 2001, who was the lawyer of Shah Bano in the Shah Bano case. The Supreme Court tried to maintain a balancing act, attempting to uphold … derick dermatology in crystal lake ilWebDec 5, 2002 · IVth Sem BCA - This document contains detailed summary of all chapters in general English. Bloomfield’s Contribution to Linguistics; Newest. 38D - Yes; Complainant - Yes; Moot Problem, 2024 - Yes; ... It is contended by the petitioner's Counsel by placing reliance on a decision reported in Danial Latifi v. Union of India, , wherein it is held ... derick dillard\\u0027s motherWebSarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India, A.I.R. 2005 S.C. 2920 Parag Sayta* In Sarbananda Sonowal v . Union of India, the Hon'ble Supreme Court struck down the polemical Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983, ("I.M.D.T. Act") on grounds of violation of Articles 14 and 355 of the Constitution . This case can be considered chronic rhinitis patient ukWebCITATION- AIR 2001 SC 3958 DECIDED ON- 28th Sept. 2001 BENCH- G.B. Pattanaik, S. Rajendra Babu, D.P. Mohapatra, Doraiswamy Raju, Shivraj V. Patil CASE INTRODUCTION- The one of counsel of Shah Bano’s, Danial Latifi Challenged the above act on the basis of its constitutional validity as violation of article 14 & 15. After the Landmark Judgement of … chronic rhinitis signs and symptomsWebSep 28, 2001 · Danial Latifi & Anr. Vs. Union of India. by Court Verdict · September 28, 2001. Email. Appeal: Writ Petition(Civil) No. 868 of 1986 Under Article 32 of the … derick dermatology emailWebAug 1, 2024 · Muslim lady was left to be kept up on the hands of their family members after the iddat period. In this way, the constitutional validity of the Act was challenged before the Supreme Court in this case (Danial Latifi) through a writ petition. Petitioners contended that the Act is unconstitutional and infringing Article 14, 15, and 21. derick gomez in diamond bar highWebDanial Latifi And Another v. Union Of India . S. Rajendra Babu, J.—. The constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (hereinafter … derick gregory athens ohio