Independent thought vs union of india summary
Web7 mrt. 2024 · Independent Thought vs. Union of India. In The Supreme Court of India Civil Original Jurisdiction Case No. Writ petition (civil) no. 382 of 2013 Petitioner … Web27 sep. 2024 · 1994 Ismail Faruqui verdict. In Dr M Ismail Faruqui vs Union of India, the Supreme Court considered the question of acquisition of religious place by the State. A temple, church or a mosque, etc ...
Independent thought vs union of india summary
Did you know?
Web9 sep. 2024 · The present petition was filed in the Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India case in 2024 to legalize homosexuality and recognize the rights of the LGBT community. Earlier in the year 2009, the Delhi High Court deemed that the first portion of Section 377 IPC was unconstitutional and the matter was rejected by Supreme Court in 2015. The present writ … Web26 jul. 2024 · Union Of India vs M/S K.C.Sharma And Co. Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NO.9049-9053 OF 2011 : Judgement on: 14 th August 2024: Appellant: Union of India Anr. ... Independent Thought vs. Union of India and Anr. 26 July 2024 Epuru Sudhakar & Anr vs Govt. Of A.P. & Ors 26 September 2024 M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar …
Web15 dec. 2024 · Background and Issue. The petitioner, Nandini Praveen, a law student, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 challenging Section 6 (2), 6 (3), 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (SMA). The Special Marriage Act, 1954 aims to formalise and provide for the registration of ... Web17 aug. 2024 · Independent Thought v. Union of India (2024) 10 SCC 800. December 9, 2024; J. J. Merchant v. Srinath Chaturvedi AIR 2002 SC 2931 December 9, 2024; Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan v. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair (1986) 1 SCC 118 December 9, 2024; Prof. Imtiaz ahmad v. Durdana Zamir (2009) 109 DRJ 357 December …
Web17 aug. 2024 · It was urged by the Union of India then that if any legislative action is held to be necessary for the implementation of the Indo-Pakistan Agreement, a law of Parliament relating to Art. 3 of the Constitution would be sufficient for the purpose and that it would not be necessary to take any action under Art. 368. The Court rejected that argument. WebAccording to the Union of India, keeping in view this stark reality and also keeping in view the sanctity which is attached to a union like marriage, the Parliament, in its …
Web16 apr. 2024 · Independent Thought, the petitioner, is a national human rights organization that was founded on August 6, 2009. On June 11, 2013, a public interest petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution contesting the legitimacy and constitutionality of Exception 2, claiming that it was arbitrary and discriminatory towards girls.
WebIndependent Thought vs. Union of India (2024) 10 SCC 800. The petitioner is a society registered a non-governmental organization, Independent Thought, as on 6th August … does a lighter shaft help swing speedhttp://lc2.du.ac.in/DATA/19.pdf does a light wave require a mediumWeb19 okt. 2024 · A large part of the judgement in Independent Thought is dedicated to child marriage and its resultant evils. The Supreme Court observed that the exception, as it … does a life estate have to be probated